Both sit at the very bottom of the market. The Cubot costs a bit more but adds 120 Hz and a bigger screen.
Short answer
Cubot A40 - 6.88" 120 Hz, 48 MP camera, 16 MP selfie, 5100 mAh. Oscal Flat 3C - compact 6.56" and cheaper.
Key differences
| Spec | Cubot A40 | OSCAL FLAT 3C |
|---|---|---|
| Chip | UNISOC T606 | UNISOC T310 |
| Display | 6.88", IPS LCD, 720×1640, 120 Hz | 6.56", IPS LCD, 720×1612, 60 Hz |
| RAM / storage | 4/64 GB, 4/256 GB | 4/64 GB, 4/128 GB |
| Rear cameras | 48 MP + 2 MP | 32 MP |
| Front | 16 MP | 13 MP |
| Battery | 5100 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charging | 10 W | 10 W |
| Protection | — | IP54 |
| Thickness / weight | 8.8 mm | 8.85 mm / 199.5 g |
| Price | current prices | current prices |
Specs come from the device pages on Smartphone.ua.
Chips
UNISOC T606 and UNISOC T310 - entry level.
Screen
6.88" 120 Hz on the Cubot vs 6.56" on the Oscal.
Cameras
48 + 2 MP and 16 MP on the Cubot vs 32 and 13 MP on the Oscal.
Verdict: who should buy which
- Screen and camera - Cubot A40.
- Price and compactness - Oscal Flat 3C.
FAQ
How fast does the Oscal charge?
10 W.
How heavy is the Oscal?
199.5 g.
Which is cheaper?
The Oscal Flat 3C.
