Both are IP69K rugged and still relatively slim. The prices are almost the same.
Short answer
Oscal Marine 3 - 8 GB RAM, 18 W, 10.7 mm and 245 g. Cubot KingKong ES Pro - 64 MP camera, 16 MP selfie, 5100 mAh.
Key differences
| Spec | OSCAL MARINE 3 | Cubot KingKong ES Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chip | MediaTek Helio G81 | UNISOC T7255 |
| Display | 6.56", IPS LCD, 720×1612, 90 Hz | 6.56", IPS LCD, 720×1612, 90 Hz |
| RAM / storage | 8/128 GB, 8/256 GB | 6/64 GB, 6/128 GB |
| Rear cameras | 16 MP + 13 MP | 64 MP + 2 MP |
| Front | 13 MP | 16 MP |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5100 mAh |
| Charging | 18 W | 10 W |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP68/IP69K |
| Thickness / weight | 10.7 mm / 245 g | 12.8 mm |
| Price | current prices | current prices |
Specs come from the device pages on Smartphone.ua.
Chips
MediaTek Helio G81 and UNISOC T7255 - a similar level.
Cameras
64 + 2 MP on the Cubot vs 16 + 13 MP on the Oscal.
Memory
8/128-256 GB on the Oscal vs 6/64-128 GB on the Cubot.
Verdict: who should buy which
- Memory and slimness - Oscal Marine 3.
- Camera - Cubot KingKong ES Pro.
FAQ
Are both rugged?
Yes, IP68/IP69K.
How thick is the Cubot?
12.8 mm.
Which is cheaper?
The Marine 3.
