Both are gigabit and dual-band. The Archer C64 costs noticeably more - for a port, VPN and compactness.
Short answer
Archer C64 - 4 LAN, VPN, 400 Mbit/s on 2.4 GHz, a 120×120 mm body. Tenda AC10 - 3 LAN and noticeably cheaper.
Key differences
| Spec | Tenda AC10 | TP-Link Archer C64 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | router | router |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5, AC1200 | Wi-Fi 5, AC1200 |
| Wi-Fi speed | 300 + 867 Mbit/s | 400 + 867 Mbit/s |
| Bands | 2.4 + 5 GHz | 2.4 + 5 GHz |
| WAN | 1 × 1 Gbit/s | 1 × 1 Gbit/s |
| LAN | 3 × 1 Gbit/s | 4 × 1 Gbit/s |
| Antennas | 4 external | 4 external |
| VPN | no | yes |
| Dimensions, weight | 220×141.5×49 mm, 350 g | 120×120×27.9 mm |
| Price | current prices | current prices |
Specs come from the device pages on Smartphone.ua.
Wi-Fi
300 + 867 vs 400 + 867 Mbit/s.
Ports
3 vs 4 gigabit LAN.
VPN
The C64 has it; according to the spec sheet the AC10 doesn't.
Verdict: who should buy which
- VPN and 4 ports - TP-Link Archer C64.
- Price - Tenda AC10.
FAQ
Is the WAN the same?
Yes, 1 Gbit/s.
How many antennas?
4 each.
Which is cheaper?
The Tenda AC10.